Crim Pro Study Group (week 1)

A courtroom scene with a judge, attorney, and a defendant, showcasing elements of criminal procedure, with a focus on legal books and a gavel.

Criminal Procedure Study Quiz

Test your knowledge of criminal procedure with this engaging quiz! Designed for students, legal enthusiasts, and professionals alike, each question will challenge your understanding of essential concepts and landmark cases.

Key Features:

7 Thought-Provoking Questions
Multiple Choice Format
Applicable Legal Principles

7 Questions2 MinutesCreated by AnalyzingJustice452

Under the holdings of Randolph, which of the following is NOT a required element of a valid co-occupant consent to search?

Objecting co-occupant is physically absent at the time consent is asked for

Police have a warrant to search the home

Consent to search was given by one who possess common authority over premises or effects

T/F: When getting consent to search from co-occupants, police may remove the objecting occupant from the premises for the purpose of avoiding the objection

True

False

T/F: Consent to search cannot be validly given if the individual does not know they have the right to refuse consent

True

False

In which of the following cases did the Court establish the "hot pursuit" exception?

T/F Hypo: Officers walk up to the front door of someone's home, cover the peephole, knock on the front door, and pretend they are someone else. After knocking, they hear someone inside say, "flush the drugs!" Police immediately enter the house and find contraband. Was this a valid search?

Yes - Valid exigent circumstance

No - Invalid exigent circumstance

T/F: Officers may administer any type of blood alcohol test during a search incident to a lawful arrest

True

False

Given the facts in Welsh v. Wisconsin, which of the following warrant exceptions do you think the police could have used to gain entry to Mr. Welsh's home?

Crim Pro Study Group (week 1)

Criminal Procedure Study Quiz

More Quizzes