Maker LogoSuper Survey Maker
Survey MakerSurvey TemplatesContactPrivacy & Security

Thank you for taking time to complete the following questionnaire on the Legal Practitioners’ Qualifying Examination Course. The purpose of this questionnaire is to enable the Institute gather information from you in our quest to continuously improve service delivery.
 
The first 33 questions will require you to rate the 11 Heads (Subjects) On a scale of 1 to 5  5 – Excellent 4 – Very Good 3 – Good 2 – Average 1 - Poor

On a scale of 1 to 5, rate Professional Conduct and Ethics Lectures (Head One) in the manner and clarity of material delivery.
1
2
3
4
5
On a scale of 1 to 5, rate Professional Conduct and Ethics Lectures (Head One) in terms of consistency of lectures in relation to syllabus.
On a scale of 1 to 5, rate Professional Conduct and Ethics (Head One) in terms-availability of lecturer
On a scale of 1 to 5, rate Book Keeping and Accounts Lectures (Head Two) in the manner and clarity of material delivered
On a scale of 1 to 5, rate Book Keeping and Accounts Lectures (Head Two) in terms of consistency of lectures in relation to syllabus.
On a scale of 1 to 5, rate Book Keeping and Accounts Lectures (Head Two) in terms-availability of lecturer
On a scale of 1 to 5, rate Conveyancing and Legislative Drafting Lectures (Head Three) in the manner and clarity of material delivered
On a scale of 1 to 5, rate Conveyancing and Legislative Drafting (Head Two) in terms of consistency of lectures in relation to syllabus.
On a scale of 1 to 5, rate Conveyancing and Legislative Drafting Lectures (Head Three) in terms-availability of lecturer
On a scale of 1 to 5, rate Probate and Succession Lectures (Head Four) in the manner and clarity of material delivered
On a scale of 1 to 5, rate Probate and Succession Lectures (Head Four) in terms of consistency of lectures in relation to syllabus.
On a scale of 1 to 5, rate Probate and Succession Lectures (Head Four) in terms-availability of lecturer
On a scale of 1 to 5, rate Company Law and Procedure (Head Six) in the manner and clarity of material delivered
On a scale of 1 to 5, rate Company Law and Procedure (Head Six) in terms of consistency of lectures in relation to syllabus.
On a scale of 1 to 5, rate Company Law and Procedure (Head Six) in terms-availability of lecturer
On a scale of 1 to 5, rate Commercial Transactions (Head Five) in the manner and clarity of material delivered
On a scale of 1 to 5, rate Commercial Transactions (Head Five) in terms of consistency of lectures in relation to syllabus.
On a scale of 1 to 5, rate Commercial Transactions (Head Five) in terms-availability of lecturer
On a scale of 1 to 5, rate Superior Courts Civil Procedure (7i) in the manner and clarity of material delivered
On a scale of 1 to 5, rate Superior Courts Civil Procedure (7i) in terms of consistency of lectures in relation to syllabus.
On a scale of 1 to 5, rate Superior Courts Civil Procedure (7i) in terms-availability of lecturer
On a scale of 1 to 5, rate Subordinate Courts Civil Procedure (7ii) in the manner and clarity of material delivered
On a scale of 1 to 5, rate Subordinate Courts Civil Procedure (7ii) in terms of consistency of lectures in relation to syllabus.
On a scale of 1 to 5, rate Subordinate Courts Civil Procedure (7ii) in terms-availability of lecturer
On a scale of 1 to 5, rate Domestic Relations (8) in the manner and clarity of material delivered
On a scale of 1 to 5, rate Domestic Relations (8) in terms of consistency of lectures in relation to syllabus.
On a scale of 1 to 5, rate Domestic Relations (8) in terms-availability of lecturer
On a scale of 1 to 5, rate Criminal Procedure (9) in the manner and clarity of material delivered
On a scale of 1 to 5, rate Criminal Procedure (9) in terms of consistency of lectures in relation to syllabus.
On a scale of 1 to 5, rate Criminal Procedure (9) in terms-availability of lecturer
On a scale of 1 to 5, rate Evidence and Procedure (10) in the manner and clarity of material delivered
On a scale of 1 to 5, rate Evidence and Procedure (10) in terms of consistency of lectures in relation to syllabus.
On a scale of 1 to 5, rate Evidence and Procedure (10)in terms-availability of lecturer
Library/Availability of reading materials?
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Average
Poor
Adequacy of furniture (desks and chairs)?
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Average
Poor
Quality of Public Address System
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Average
Poor
Lighting and ventilation in Lecture Hall?
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Average
Poor
Helpfulness/courtesy of Staff?
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Average
Poor
We are interested to learn more about students’ satisfaction with their ZIALE experience.
1. Please describe what aspect of ZIALE, you been most satisfied with?
2. Please describe what aspect of ZIALE, you been least satisfied with? Listed below are several aspects of students’ experience at ZIALE. Please honestly rate your level of dissatisfaction-satisfaction by circling an answer for each item:
 

Very Dissatisfied

(VD)

1

Dissatisfied

(D)

2

Neither Satisfied or Dissatisfied (N)

3

Satisfied

(S)

4

Very Satisfied

(VS)

5
My satisfaction/dissatisfaction with…
Library resources
1
2
3
4
5
Opportunities to make friends
1
2
3
4
5
Professionalism of my lecturers
1
2
3
4
5
Lecture Hall ,
1
2
3
4
5
Social events provided for students.
1
2
3
4
5
Level of knowledge of the staff who teach me
1
2
3
4
5
Availability of computers & technology
1
2
3
4
5
Quality of the education I am receiving
1
2
3
4
5
Extra campus facilities
1
2
3
4
5
Interest that teaching staff take in my progress
1
2
3
4
5
Teaching ability of my lecturers
1
2
3
4
5
Programmme Duration
1
2
3
4
5
Application of Knowledge Acquired from class
1
2
3
4
5
Overall quality of the ZIALE facilities
1
2
3
4
5
Online Delivery of the Programme
1
2
3
4
5
Were you satisfied with the inclusion of tutorials on the programme?
Were you satisfied with the the attachments you undertook during the course of the programmme??
Were you satisfied with the overall duration of the programme?
Do you have recommendations you may want to see on the programme?
{"name":"Thank you for taking time to complete the following questionnaire on the Legal Practitioners’ Qualifying Examination Course. The purpose of this questionnaire is to enable the Institute gather information from you in our quest to continuously improve service delivery. The first 33 questions will require you to rate the 11 Heads (Subjects) On a scale of 1 to 5 5 – Excellent 4 – Very Good 3 – Good 2 – Average 1 - Poor", "url":"https://www.supersurvey.com/QPREVIEW","txt":"On a scale of 1 to 5, rate Professional Conduct and Ethics Lectures (Head One) in the manner and clarity of material delivery., On a scale of 1 to 5, rate Professional Conduct and Ethics Lectures (Head One) in terms of consistency of lectures in relation to syllabus., On a scale of 1 to 5, rate Professional Conduct and Ethics (Head One) in terms-availability of lecturer","img":"https://www.supersurvey.com/3012/images/ogquiz.png","accounts":"@Legal Learners"}

More Surveys

JSU vs KSU Attendance
100
3 Year AKAversary Trip Poll
3228
LonaRPG stuff
3231
Picnic Day Drinks
210
Potential candle name changes
420
NifL Preseason (Redraft & Dynasty)
13617
Jersey Coast
10529
OGE
630
Make your own Survey
- it's free to start.
Super Survey Logo
Powered by
Super Survey Maker | Super Templates Make your own Survey