Reviews within test development team
Test Review Dynamics Quiz
Explore the intricacies of test artifact reviews with this engaging quiz designed for test developers. Understand your feelings, fears, and perspectives on the review process within your team.
- Assess your enthusiasm for reviews
- Evaluate your confidence and skills
- Identify best practices for team reviews
Are you interested in doing review ?
Yes, always excited about it
No I feel its waste of time
No, as I have no idea for what and why review is done
Yes, but I don't have skill
What is your feeling when you review test artifacts (MR, design etc) from other team members
Curious and investigative
Don't care - its just another process
No body cares about my review
I have to find missing items/defects/faults
Do you fear while reviewing or getting reviewed?
No, what is there to fear?
Yes, thats why I close my eyes and pretend I didn’t see bugs today so tomorrow author will ignore my mistakes in my artifact
Yes, because if I reject this code, I will delay the release
Yes, other team members will laugh/think bad about my comments
Yes, as the review is linked to my goals
What do you feel when your test artifacts (MR, design etc) is rejected and a lot of "re-work" is required?
Challenged and motivated
Frustrated
A bit of both
I don't care
What do you think about review of your test artifact by others in the team?
I have to do it as it is enforced in my team
Feel pressured and pray that no faults are found
Feel as a channel to get feedback, improve quality and learn
Waste of time as my work doesn't require any review
Do you think everyone in our test team is competent enough to do review?
Yes
No
Do you think review guidelines, checklists, best practices will help improve review competency within team
Yes
No, training is required in addition
What do you think from the below, is best suited review process for our test team?
One to one peer review -> agree/reject -> finalise
Scrum team review -> agree/reject -> finalise
Scrum team review -> different scrum team review -> agree/reject -> finalise
Scrum team review -> senior/maintainer/PO review -> agree/reject -> finalise
How do you handle conflict while review as a reviewer and author in the current form?
Don't care, either of you accept by saying "let’s make peace just to stop fighting"
Try to convince rationally : reviewer says "You’re right; I take my comments back!” or author says "i will rework"
Both of you say "Let’s do what senior/PO/architect/team says"
Mix of last 2 options
{"name":"Reviews within test development team", "url":"https://www.supersurvey.com/QPREVIEW","txt":"Explore the intricacies of test artifact reviews with this engaging quiz designed for test developers. Understand your feelings, fears, and perspectives on the review process within your team.Assess your enthusiasm for reviewsEvaluate your confidence and skillsIdentify best practices for team reviews","img":"https:/images/course8.png"}
More Surveys
Previous Retrospective Meeting Steps Implementation Status
15822
Squad Health Check
11639
Feedback Survey
7423
Implementation Status of Sprint 4 Retrospective Meeting Remarks
15818
Daily Triage Meeting
13610
Group F (Contemporary and Management approaches)
5227
Cross-ISG Test Community - Your bug-related workflow?
11612
Sprint 8 Team Review Survey
3225
How did WE (as a team) do on agreed retro actions
7423
Enhancing Communication
11623
Keep It Fresh and Engaging
7421
Rhubarb Future Ways of Working Autumn 2022 - Sprint Management
10512